Baeken Woensel-West Bas Termeer

Baeken Woensel-West / Bas Termeer


Trudo’s idea is to understand iconic buildings on 16 angles on Edisonstraat, placed on top of alike plinths. Die derrendirrix intended the master plan and will too take care of the project of the plinths. The race focused on the firstly two corners, with Baeken existence selected as the winning arrangement for site Edisonstraat and Baekelandplein.

There’s the plinth, a weighty and dark volume which purposes as a pedestal for the superstructure and adds profitable space to the area. On top of the pedestal there’s a bright red capacity containing two short stay guesthouse rooms. It’s strange and nonconcrete in its presence and links to the bloodshot light district straight by its color. Over it there’s a steel construction wrapped in a spicy ornamented mesh, like a huge fishnet stocking, mentioning to Baekelandplein. These two basics, volume and voile, create an thrilling in between space.

Because plinth and building are kept apart from the adjacent housing building by about one and a partial meter, its blind frontage was kept untouched. The covering block’s façade together with the tie façade, form a vertical space in which a conventional staircase goes up.

Inside the capacity oddly positioned windows offer hotel visitors a diversity of opinions, while at the similar time the obscuring result of the voile protects their confidentiality, but also the confidentiality of the Baekelandplein companies.* The lace façade was intended in cooperation with Lace Barrier.

Central Questions in Research Phase:

  1. What is the structural system employed and materials used [e.g., space frame, truss, shell, dome, etc.]?

This classification is founded on the distribution of the components of the main lateral load-resisting scheme over the building.

  1. How does it function or what is the load path described in writing and by using graphic diagrams. [I.e. transfer of gravity and lateral loads through the system components]?

The load path is just the direction in which each uninterrupted load will pass through linked members. The sequence begins at the highest point of the structure employed all the way down to the footing scheme, eventually transferring the total load of the construction to the foundation.

  1. Why was the system employed, is the reason clear [e.g. high seismic risk area, cost, historic preservation, sustainable criteria /materials, prefabrication or spanning requirements construction, transportation or appearance grade quality of the structure.

A contract of service may be lawfully terminated in an amount of ways. If your incorporated connotation needs to terminate an employee’s service, it is significant to find out how the service can be terminated and what events the association must follow in implementation that termination.

  1. What is the size, shape, configuration of the building in plan and section; spans, height, material used?

The seismic resistance of structures is directly related to building shape. Although configurations are extremely diverse their derivation is not random.

  1. What are the connections used, pinned, rigid, braced, etc…?

You can reason of a rigid frame building like a bench. An ordinary banquet table held together and made stable by actual tight junctions of the tabletop then legs is built along the similar principles as a rigid edge building.

  1. How is rigidity provided in the system, i.e. how does it retain its shape; rigid connections, bracing, diaphragms?

The rigid frame construction is subjected to a perpendicular load, it is also picked up by the rays and eventually transferred finished the columns to the ground.

  1. How does the system integrate mechanical/electrical or enclosure elements in the design and meet fire protection requirements for the structure?

The protection can be if through the use of guardrail systems, care net systems, or personal fall capture systems. OSHA refers to these systems as conventional fall defense. Other schemes and methods of fall protection might be used when execution certain activities.

  1. How is the system related to means and methods of construction or assembly? Is it made to be demountable, transported, pre-assembled, and constructed with basic tools?

Means and methods of edifice are ordinarily understood to be enclosed under general liability policies, somewhat than professional liability rules.

  1. How is the structure related to spaces formed, daylight, material color/texture, visually apparent detailing or tectonic characteristics?

Comprised of novel and renovated buildings from both minor towns and major cities, the victors were chosen by a panel of manufacturing professionals. What marries them, aside from being arresting buildings, is how they demonstrate the influential effect that architecture, through rudiments like space, light, geometry and resources, can have on our mood.


Alcorn, J.A. & Baird, G. 1996. Use of a hybrid energy analysis method for evaluating the embodied energy of building materials.

Renewable Energy 8 (1–4): 319-322.

Cole, R. & Kernan, P. 1996. Life-Cycle Energy Use in Office Buildings. Building & Environment 31 (4): 307-317

Cole, R.J. 1998. “Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems.” Building

and Environment 34 (3): 335-348.

Dimoudi, A. & Tompa, C. 2008. Energy and environmental indicators related to construction of office buildings. Resources, Conservation

and Recycling 53 (1–2): 86-95.

González, M.J., & Navarro, J.G. 2006. Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection

of materials: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact.” Building and Environment 41 (7): 902-909.

Griffin, C.T., Knowles, C., Theodoropoulos, C., & Allen, J. 2010a. Barriers to the implementation of sustainable structural materials

in green buildings. In: Cruz P, editor. Structures and Architecture: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Structures

& Architecture (ICSA2010). Guimarães, Portugal, 21-23 July 2010. 1315-1323.

Griffin, C.T., Reed, B., & Hsu, S. 2010b. Comparing the embodied energy of structural systems in buildings. In: Cruz P, editor.

Structures and Architecture: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Structures & Architecture (ICSA2010). Guimarães,

Portugal, 21-23 July 2010. 1333-1339.

Gustavsson, L. & Sathre, R. 2006. Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials.

Building and Environment 41 (7): 940-951.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *